Currently %autosetup only supports conditional patch application by either
conditionalizing the patch declarations (which leads to inconsistent src.rpms).
The other alternative is falling back to %autosetup -N and manual patch
application with (ranged) %autopatch and/or plain %patch, both of which are
error-prone.
While ideally you don't carry conditional patches, real world often disagrees.
We need a better way to handle this, something that removes the need for humans
to deal with individual patch numbers while preserving them all in the src.rpm.
One possible idea could be supporting multiple (named) %patchlist sections that
are generally applied in the order they appear in the spec, but allow
conditionalizing by the name/keyword, eg `%patchlist -k s390` whose patches are
only applied if %bcond s390 is true.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3110
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
