About that "legacy" name: how about changing it to "traditional"? It doesn't 
sound so negative and also suggests that the code is somewhat not state of the 
art.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3083#issuecomment-2122328519
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3083/c2122328...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to