On Monday 17 November 2008 04:12:07 pm مؤيد السعدي wrote: > >>>> why we don't pack suns' java like them ? is there any legal issue ? > > > > and > > > >>> We build from source. this includes the jdk. > > hello! I'm talking about nonfree branch of rpmfusion > that's why I'm not posting to fedora-devel > rpmfusion contains re-distributable binary only stuff like nvidia > > and I hate java and I don't use it (unless when I'm forced to do that) so I > don't know what bugs does open java have and what it can't run > I have tried Sarf (http://sarf.sourceforge.net/) it's an opensource > morphology engine written on Java and it worked but I can't type Arabic in > text entry boxes and when I past them from other application it did not get > them > > I'm not reporting this bug, my point is that some people needs java-sun not > java-openjdk > > and we should give people the freedom to choose > > can any one tell me why ? which term of the EULA ... ? that we can't > redistribute a well-packaged rpm for sun's java
Just a guess -- I'd guess there's a either a "no redistribution" or "non-commercial only" redistribution clause, either of which is a no go. -- Conrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
