Hi,

Happy new year all!

On 01/03/2010 08:53 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Arntz<[email protected]>  wrote:
Greetings!

Welcome!

My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to 
introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages that 
RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a programmer, but 
I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my first package 
submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on FCE Ultra. My 
first question, though, where would be a good place to host the .spec and .srpm 
files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of sites like rapidshare, 
megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure if those would be the best 
places to host the files. Once I am able to find a place to post them, I will 
take the plunge and file my submission for review.

I know these, but AFAIK they only use Italian language:

http://it.altervista.org/
http://xoom.virgilio.it/

Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based on GFCE 
Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two separate 
packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of 
fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and 
gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique 
packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.

I disagree with Hans. I would make two separate packages. I still
don't know why upstream put them in the same tarball. They are
different programs in every aspect: one is made in C and the other in
python, they have different build systems and so on. There is no
correlation between the two. I did ask upstream some time ago about
releasing different tarball: one for fceux and the other for gceux.
They told me they would have done so, but it seems they forgot. I
think it is time someone else nag them :)


Yes, that seems like valid reasoning to break the 1 tarbal 1 srpm rule.

Regards,

Hans

Reply via email to