W dniu 2012-12-20 01:41, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Sáb, 2012-11-10 at 11:57 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 08.11.2012 21:43, Sérgio Basto pisze:
On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 16:42 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2012-10-28 at 07:38 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:


It built, but the process took 600 minutes. This is still a bit slow
IMO. I'll just build the missing mame-0.147 for F-18 and hold on with
u-releases until we get more memory for the buildsys.


14860 (mame): Build on target fedora-18-rpmfusion_nonfree succeeded.


i686: builder1.rpmfusion.org Status:  done/done Build Time:  85 minutes
x86_64: builder1.rpmfusion.org Status:  done/done Build Time:  210
minutes

My bet is a problem only with rawhide (F19) build system.

http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_nonfree/14859-mame-0.147u1-2.fc19/i686/root.log
we can see in this link that we have lots of "Cannot allocate memory" ,
while on F18 we don't have .

I remember see a failed build log with VirtualBox on F19 like "Memory
exhausted" , but never in F18

Comparing building mame-0_147u2 on F16, F17 , F18 and Rawhide

http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14967

http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14966

http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14976

http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=14907

F16 Build Time =~ 96 minutes
F17 Build Time =~ 107 minutes
but F18 Build Time =~ 1250 minutes !?!
and F19 Build Time =~ 676 minutes

So my guess was totally wrong , So what is the the problem ?  is from
new releases ?



Just for comparison, here is how long it took on my machine (yum and
root cache fully updated, no ccache):

F-17 x86_64:  38 minutes 0 seconds
F-18 x86_64:  40 minutes 58 seconds
devel x86_64: 44 minutes 51 seconds

So, it seems there is nothing that much different cpu-time-wise. I asked
on the devel ML how to get some memory usage stats, will report back
once I have them.


Hi,
mame-0_147u4-1

build in less of 130 minutes in all branches F19, F18, F17 and F16 .

this is problem is fixed ? if yes let close the bug
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2554


Thanks,

It's not fixed, it's worked around. I had to disable dwz [1] to make it work. The bug should stay open until the builder gets enough memory so that it is not needed any more IMO.

Regards,
Julian

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor

Reply via email to