Hi,
On 08-11-15 16:34, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com>
wrote:
There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
for rebuild next week.
I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
which packages still need to be rebuilt?
Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
I'll try send the list this afternoon.
Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
system .
1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
repoquery --archlist=i386,i686
--disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf
"%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt
2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need
to rebuild:
cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr
3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
cat listall.txt | grep fc22 | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u
after pipe with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got
the list in attachment
4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1 more buildsys and
releases packages
Sergio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Sergio's original mail) but
I do not
think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild
packages
which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not
rebuild
all packages which have not been rebuild yet.
Thanks but I thought that is to follow Fedora and it was all packages
[1], I ask that at the time.
Anyway, Nicolas mention an provenpackager, I don't mind take care of the
mass rebuild , just need some instructions and the OK from Nicolas.
Another topic, that I not take care, is the packages that need matching
their fedora counterpart , can someone list it ? , are they only all
freeworld packages ? or we have exceptions ?
I think that *freeworld is a good start, I do not know any exceptions from
the top of my head. If anyone knows of any exceptions please speak-up now.
Regards,
Hans
