The error of rfpkg-free -d -v build --target f24-free : ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello , with clean rfpkg > > rfpkg -d -v new-sources x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2 > > works !! > > > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free/x264/x264-0.148-20160614-a5e06b9.tar.bz2/md5/504515ba14fed322ad89cf39f05e78ee/ > the file is there > > rfpkg-free srpm , works when I use https in lookaside ( lookaside = > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free ) > > now the build almost worked > http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3731 after issue the > command > > rfpkg-free -d -v build --target f24-free > > default target was : f24-candidate > > Could not execute build: Unknown build target: f24-candidate > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 2016-06-21 18:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>: >>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Ok, upload-sources worked for me and I believe everything correct >>> for a >>> >> > build. >>> >> >>> >> are you sure ? >>> > >>> > >>> > Mine didn't show any errors: >>> > >>> > $ rfpkg new-sources ~/rpmbuild/mythtv/SOURCES/mythtv-0.28.tar.gz >>> > Uploading: /home/build/rpmbuild/mythtv/SOURCES/mythtv-0.28.tar.gz >>> > >>> ######################################################################## >>> > 100.0% >>> > Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file >>> > >>> > and the sources file was updated properly. >>> >>> Does rfpkg srpm works? and then again with the mythtv-0.28.tar.gz file >>> deleted ? >> >> >> Works with the archive present but not when deleted. >> >> $ rfpkg srpm >> Downloading mythtv-0.28.tar.gz >> ######################################################################## >> 100.0% >> Could not execute srpm: Server returned status code 400 >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> > >