On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 12:43 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 28-06-16 03:52, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Hello ! > > > > On Seg, 2016-06-27 at 20:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting > > > the > > > f24 > > > repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are > > > there. > > > > > > I accidentally found out that some not so important pkgs are > > > missing > > > though when running dnf repoquery --extras on my main workstation > > > which has way too much stuff installed :) > > > > > > Doing this gives the following (incomplete list): > > > > > > -For f24 free: > > > -SheepShaver > > > -vbam > > > -madplay > > > -mock-rpmfusion-free > > > -wormsofprey > > > -xmris > > > -zsnes > > > > > > -For f24 nonfree: > > > -d1x > > > -doom-shareware > > > -unrar > > > -mac > > > -mock-rpmfusion-nonfree > > > -roadfighter > > > -smc-music > > > -spear-demo > > > -vice > > > -wolf4sdl > > > -xv > > > > > > All of these do have builds for older Fedora releases in the new > > > koji, so the easiest fix likely is to simple tag these as > > > f24-free-updates / f24-nonfree-updates . > > > > > Yes, we have to review this , I also have a list ( of dnf list > > extras ) > > ... > > > > > > > > There seem to be 2 underlying problems: > > > > > > 1) The f24 repo did not inherit any builds from previous releases > > > (assuming we want to keep the base f24 pkg set frozen we cannot > > > fix > > > this now) > > > > > > 2) Some pkgs never got rebuild for f24, I've not checked all of > > > the > > > above, but for those which I've checked there are no failed f24 > > > builds, > > > they were likely simply never rebuild. > > > > > > As said for starters I think we should tag these into f24-free- > > > updates / > > > f24-nonfree-updates. Quite a few of the above (incomplete!) list > > > are > > > mine, so I will prepare f24 builds for them. > > > > > > I've already prepared and pushed a vice update for this, but > > > rfpkg new-sources is failing for me, and as is already known > > > rfpkg build does not work yet. > > At least at free repo , I got some reports that is working , > > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free/?C=M;O=D > Well it does not work for me, can you try to rfpkg clone nonfree/vice > and then spectool -g *.spec, verify the downloaded sources match > the md5 in the sources file, and do rfpkg new-sources (note there > are 4 sources in the sources file) and see if this works for you ?
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=704 I had install rfpkg-1.23.2-1.fc24.noarch in my F23 It is working in free repo , could you try add --nonfree , should set rpkg namespace with nonfree , although I think it is an hack . > Related to this, downloading from the lookaside-cache does not work > either, e.g. for vice rfpkg srpm fails with the first source, which > is already in the look-a-side. > > If you do get this work can you please let me know: > > 1) which version of rfpkg you're using exactly > 2) what cmdline you're using > 3) if you've any local config tweaks ? > > > > > ignatenkobrain ask to update mpg123 the source is already uploaded > > !?! > > this is what ignatenkobrain propose https://github.com/ascot-repo/m > > pg12 > > 3/blob/master/mpg123.spec > > > > in attach what I propose > esound is obsolete, Fedora has actively been working on removing it, > so we should not re-introduce deps on it, from the mpg123.spec > changelog: > > - Drop obsolete esound and arts plugins from mpg123-plugins-extras ok , I learned that today > > , I lost my chat log with him ... in resume, > > > > he removed /sbin/alternatives since claims that we haven't any > > other > > alternative and also remove other spec snippets , I don't know the > > impact of that, so I leave that to maintainers ( you :D ) . > wrt alternatives, we had mpg321 in the past not sure if we still do, > wrt the rebase to a newer version this is being tracked here: > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 > > I've also left a comment there explaining why I'm in no hurry to do > the rebase (it contains a bunch of major changes). ok , looks good to me. > Regards, > > Hans -- Sérgio M. B.