Hello, Sérgio. On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 at 02:35, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3975 > > --- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> 2016-07-19 02:35:19 CEST > --- > (In reply to comment #3) > > I'll take a look at this. Could you try running execstack -c on the > > installed > > library in the meantime? > > Be my guest , in meantime I read your thread on packaging Mailing list about > sse3 , I'd like understand if we need 2 builds for i686 ... one with sse2 > other > without it, can you give us your opinion ?
The only real concern here are applications linked against libx264, which someone might want to run on low-end hardware, because I don't think anyone would want to encode anything to H.264 on non-SSE2 capable CPU (i.e. Pentium 3 or Athlon XP and older). Considering last non-SSE2 CPUs went out of production about 8 years ago, I think it's fairly safe to assume that the impact of doing SSE2-only builds would be negligible, if any. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"