https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4215
--- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> 2016-08-28 22:54:17 CEST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > - BSD File > > > # mlt/src/win32/fnmatch.{c,h} are BSD-licensed. > > > > > > Does fnmatch end up in the linux version since it's in the win32 folder? > > > If not > > > then you don't need to consider it for licensing purposes. > > > > > > > This are the licenses of source code , should I change here ? or in Fedora > > proper ? , but see that we don't remove win32 , from source , don't know > > what > > should do. > > The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines > > "GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ and BSD" would mean that the in the resulting *binary* RPM > there some files under GLPv3, other files under LGPLv2+ and again others under > BSD. I guess this is not the case. OK, fixed License: GPLv3 and LGPLv2+ , I removed the src/win32 after %setup , to be sure that is not used . # mlt/src/win32/fnmatch.{c,h} are BSD-licensed. # be sure that aren't used rm -r src/win32/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.