2016-10-18 16:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2016-10-18 15:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@rpmfusion.org>:
>> > commit bb01bb1e4d390e5d61a697fba30f12c556c42a9e
>> > Author: Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Tue Oct 18 08:36:45 2016 -0500
>> > Remove files from scm as now an archive is provided.
>> Sorry, but I don't understand why you have forked akmods in your
>> namespace that way.
>> This is going to be more difficult to review the changes made.
> Sergio and I thought it was a good idea as SCM != Upstream and to give it a
> proper home. I don't see how it really makes anything more difficult, the
> changes are in github.
Yep, but this was totally unannounced changes, so you have failed an
important step at making free software, the advertising part.
I was not able to review the changes made even if I'm co-admin of the
package. So this is making the workflow harder.
Furthermore, if there is really a need to have a separate repos, which
I still fails to see any argument for, this has to be made in the
rpmfusion-infra namespace, like others projects do.
(until we have a better location such as a public git.rpmfusion.org
running pagure or else).
> If you would rather support it, that's fine with me, I only took it because
> it was unmaintained and I needed it for the nvidia drivers.
Yeah, that's always like that, don't worry I took the infra to
maintain for the very same reason.
Above all, I'd like theses kind of changes to be peer reviewed. This
is how a community repo can hold, if not this is only an aggregate of
first to come ideas.