> F25 don't had one mass rebuild , so it is normal have fc24 suffixes in
> f25 and rawhide (f26)

Why not build same version with fresh gcc and other devel package?

пн, 17 окт. 2016 г., 15:32 Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>:

> On Seg, 2016-10-17 at 09:24 +0000, Vascom wrote:
> > When I run
> > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25
> > I see
> > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates',
> > disabling.
> > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
> > disabling.
> >
> > May be add empty f25 updates repo as on main Fedora?
>
> Yes, rpmfusion-free-updates and rpmfusion-nonfree-updates should be
> initialized, but will be empty until GA (General Available, 15/11/2016)
>
> > And some packages in f25 development repo still has fc24 suffix. May
> > be inform their maintainers that need quick rebuild this packages for
> > F25 and rawhide.
>
> F25 don't had one mass rebuild , so it is normal have fc24 suffixes in
> f25 and rawhide (f26)
>
> > пн, 17 окт. 2016 г. в 12:09, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com>:
> > > 2016-10-17 9:49 GMT+02:00 Vascom <vasc...@gmail.com>:
> > > > May be it is time to create rpmfusion repos for F25? So users can
> > > now simply
> > > > upgrade their systems to Fedora 25 Beta.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure to understand what's your issue actually ? And why you
> > > make you think the repo aren't there.
> > > We are in the development/25 layout:
> > > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/development/25/Everyt
> > > hing/x86_64/os/
> > >
> > > And we also have the development/rawhide repo published for f26
> > > already.
> > >
> > > So really, please report your workflow that makes you think the
> > > repos
> > > aren't there, it's important to undersand.
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -
> > >
> > > Nicolas (kwizart)
> > >
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>

Reply via email to