On 08/02/2017 23:41, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/01/2017 09:53, Simone Caronni wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com >> <mailto:kwiz...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> For the record EL6 repo is provided as i686 and x86_64 whereas EL7 is >> only provided as x86_64 at this time. This lead to an issue with >> multilib packages in our infra (same as EPEL). So here is the possible >> workaround: >> If there is no specific arched dependencies (either binary only or >> because of limited BR) >> The best way is to build the same package on el6, I will also tag the >> build on el7, so both i686 and x86_64 build from el6 will be available >> on el7. >> This is what I expect to use for libtxc_dxtn (and steam eventually). >> >> >> There was a discussion to introduce an i686 target for EPEL 7, but >> unfortunately there was no progress on that. > > Maybe last weekend Fosdem got things moving forward again for 32 bits > EPEL 7 ? > >> Would it be possible to consider the i686 target in EL7 using the >> alternative architectures of CentOS in RPMFusion? >> >> This of course would make things diverge a bit from EPEL, where there is >> no 32 bit target, and some packages would actually stay in EPEL in their >> 64 bit form. >> >> Tree is here: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/ >> > How much of 32 bits EPEL 7 do we need ? > Is steam streaming really that important ? > Or in other words, can we start with just CentOS 32 bits and add EPEL 32 > bits only when it comes to light ? > > I guess I can probably find out on my own with a custom mock conf. I'm > wondering about the buildsys-build group though, as this is provided by > EPEL iirc, and I'm not sure how to handle that. > > So far, there has only been 3 packages that I couldn't build for EL7 > because of them being 32 bits only. Namely, that is steam, zsnes and > unace. There are probably more, but I'll give at least these 3 and > libtxc_dxtn a try, if I get a working mock setup. > Ok, my hacked mock conf worked, all 4 of them built fine. No run test though.
It seems cleaner to me to build against CentOS AltArch rather than building for el6 and tagging for el7, but I don't have enough data to shape up a real opinion. Thoughts ? Regards, Xavier _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
