https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4657
Bug ID: 4657
Summary: Review request: lpf-flash-plugin Flash player plugin
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
Reporter: ser...@serjux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
Hi here it is my propose,
SPEC: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/lpf-flash-plugin.spec
SRPM: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/lpf-flash-plugin-27.0.0.130-1.fc28.src.rpm
in resume https://github.com/rpmfusion/lpf-flash-plugin/pull/5 , which means I
proposing replace Npapi with Ppapi in same package , while adobe offer the 2
options , I think we should adopt only Ppapi solution , one of the reason is
because using freshplayer seems to me that Firefox works better , we use more
compiled source code.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
