https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4670
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- mvcp/ code is released under LGPLv2+ license. Add LGPLv2+ to License and
comment.
- Try to install icons under icons/dark icons/light icons/oxygen
- shotcut crashes when closed with a "core dumped" error. Debug it
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces#Obtaining_a_stack_trace_from_a_core_dump)
and ask to upstream.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[!]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[-]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
rpmlint ./shotcut-*.rpm
shotcut.src:66: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag noarch \
shotcut.src:116: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
shotcut.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
shotcut.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shotcut
shotcut-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-ca.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-cs.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-da.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-de.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-en.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-es.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-fr.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-gd.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-hu.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-it.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-ja.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-nb.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-nl.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-oc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Occitan ->
Occidental
shotcut-langpack-oc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Occitan ->
Occidental
shotcut-langpack-oc.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-pl.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-pt_BR.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-pt_PT.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-ru.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-sk.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-sl.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-tr.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-uk.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-zh_CN.noarch: W: no-documentation
shotcut-langpack-zh_TW.noarch: W: no-documentation
29 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 31 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
mock --no-clean -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free --shell 'rpmlint
shotcut'
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.6 starting (python version = 3.6.2)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux disabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Finish: chroot init
Start: shell
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
shotcut.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.shotcut.org/ <urlopen error
[Errno -2] Name or service not known>
shotcut.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
shotcut.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shotcut
shotcut.x86_64: E: invalid-appdata-file /usr/share/appdata/shotcut.appdata.xml
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
Finish: shell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
