https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4783

--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwiz...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #9)
...
> > Which name for such repo ?
> 
> Maybe something like rpmfusion-{non,}free-tainted ? Maybe we should seek for
I like the name, it's vague enough to avoid saying why it is tainted...

Splitting free/nonfree is also a good thing as for the nonfree candidate, there
are: nouveau-firmware , b43-firmware, dvb-firmware, spotify (not sure about
this last as it already exists as lpf).
All of them have a "tainted" redistribution status (nobody claimed it's not
allowed either).

Or maybe firmwares could be allowed into the free section since the firmware
exception in fedora applies to the free section...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Reply via email to