--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet <> ---
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #9)
> > Which name for such repo ?
> Maybe something like rpmfusion-{non,}free-tainted ? Maybe we should seek for
I like the name, it's vague enough to avoid saying why it is tainted...

Splitting free/nonfree is also a good thing as for the nonfree candidate, there
are: nouveau-firmware , b43-firmware, dvb-firmware, spotify (not sure about
this last as it already exists as lpf).
All of them have a "tainted" redistribution status (nobody claimed it's not
allowed either).

Or maybe firmwares could be allowed into the free section since the firmware
exception in fedora applies to the free section...

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to

Reply via email to