Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for the quick response!
First I'm going to submit 'libldac' to Fedora since the Bluetooth
package wouldn't build without it.
So you're saying that I will have to rename the package to
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld' or
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-nonfree' depending on its dependencies?
I'm going to ask upstream why fdk-aac is needed.
Best regards,
Greg
2019. 01. 30. 5:06 keltezéssel, Nicolas Chauvet írta:
Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 05:04, Gergely Gombos <[email protected]> a écrit :
Hi RPMFusion devs,
My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and I'm a
software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of open-source
software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make my contribution, too.
I'm looking for a sponsor, and my first RPM package is "pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-aptx"
and its dependency "libldac".
The original project - yet to be merged into upstream Pulseaudio - provides
awesome audio quality for Bluetooth headsets via aptX, AAC and LDAC codecs.
This is something that is hard to set up even on Windows! And this package
works seamlessly on Linux.
Originally this was in a COPR repo, with >100 downloads, but it got deleted due
to legal reasons (ffmpeg build dependency). So I hope it will find a new home here
since Fedora users are waiting for it.
I've spent quite a lot of time figuring out how RPM packaging works and get
this working and (hopefully) conforming to the guidelines - I appreciate your
review and help.
Thx for your interest in the project and welcome.
As stated by Leigh, there is a need to verify that libldac is patent
clear according to RedHat Legal or not, then we will introduce in RPM
Fusion free if needed.
Another point is that we have a policy not to replace any
fedora/redhat package. So we you cannot rename the library so it can
install along, then the other way is to conflicts with the fedora
package. End-users will have to remove the fedora package and install
ours.
Also you seems to provide a binary package using a source archive
which name is already in the fedora repo. We used to have a -freeworld
suffix to handle such case when the package is relevant to the free
section and -nonfree suffix when it's relevant to the nonfree section.
Please try to adapt as appropriate.
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
