On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:10 PM Hans de Goede <j.w.r.dego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One more remark, /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion-[non]free-rawhide.repo > ship with gpgcheck=0 by default, but as my testing has just verified > the packages there are signed, so maybe we should change that to > gpgcheck=1 instead, as we do for the other repos? > Here's the weirder thing, from the currently-shipping files for F30 (I downloaded the release RPMs and extracted, to ensure the config wasn't locally modified): $ egrep '^(\[|gpgcheck)' rpmfusion-*.repo rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-free-rawhide] rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=0 rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-free-rawhide-debuginfo] rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=1 rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-free-rawhide-source] rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=1 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide] rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=0 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide-debuginfo] rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=1 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:[rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide-source] rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo:gpgcheck=1 ...Why would it *only* be off for the binary RPM repos?
_______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
