Hi, I started the sentence with "if", "if glib1 and gtk+ will be removed"
As news, I was going to write that everything is just depending on xmms, so the question is not about retire glib1 and gtk+ but is about retire xmms XD normalize depends on flac and flac have a sub package with xmms dependencies, as faad2 had it, so after remove that xmms dep , we can build flac and subsequently normalize . On Sat, 2021-05-22 at 08:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote: > 1: I have fixed faad2 so it doesn't have xmms for f35+ > > 2: I have retired xmms-mplayer for f35+ > > 3: I believe normalize is more trouble than it's worth and should be > retired from rpmfusion. > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4986 > > 4: gsview can be retired. > > 5: uade can be retired. > > > On 21/05/2021 22:19, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > if glib1 and gtk+ will be removed, we will have these package > > affected > > [1] by query [2] > > > > > > [1] > > rpmfusion-free-rawhide faad2 (when with xmms) > > rpmfusion-free-rawhide normalize (when flac needs xmms) > > rpmfusion-free-rawhide xmms-mplayer > > rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide gsview (4.9 needs gkt-devel) > > rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide uade (Unix Amiga DeliTracker Emulator) > > > > [1] > > dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo={rpmfusion-{non,}free- > > ,}rawhide --whatrequires glib --qf "%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}" -q | > > pkgname > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> > > Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora > > <de...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, p...@city-fan.org, > > paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com > > Subject: Let's retire original glib and gtk+ > > Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:45:09 +0000 > > > > Hi, I'd like to retire the original glib, GLib 1 from the GNOME 1 > > era. > > This is would take out the gtk+ package (GTK 1) along with it. (I'm > > not > > proposing to remove GTK 2.) GLib 1 has been obsolete for 19 years > > now, > > maintain a compatibility package, so I'm not sympathetic to > > anything > > that still requires it. > > > > GLib 2 has been API and ABI stable for 19 years now, so it's not > > moving > > too fast for your package to depend on. :) The full list of > > packages > > still depending on GLib 1 is below. If you own one of the below > > packages, please consider upgrading to GLib 2. The only one that I > > recognize is Sagemath. > > > > $ sudo dnf repoquery --recursive --whatrequires glib > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:04 ago on Fri 07 May 2021 > > 09:06:03 > > AM CDT. > > Singular-0:4.1.1p3-24.fc34.x86_64 > > Singular-doc-0:4.1.1p3-24.fc34.x86_64 > > Singular-emacs-0:4.1.1p3-24.fc34.x86_64 > > Singular-surfex-0:4.1.1p3-24.fc34.x86_64 > > bubblemon-0:1.46-29.fc34.x86_64 > > collectd-xmms-0:5.12.0-2.fc34.x86_64 > > gap-pkg-happrime-0:0.6-5.20190208.edfbd41.fc34.noarch > > gap-pkg-happrime-doc-0:0.6-5.20190208.edfbd41.fc34.noarch > > gap-pkg-singular-0:2020.12.18-2.fc34.noarch > > gap-pkg-singular-doc-0:2020.12.18-2.fc34.noarch > > glib-devel-1:1.2.10-62.fc34.i686 > > glib-devel-1:1.2.10-62.fc34.x86_64 > > golang-github-mattn-gtk-devel-0:0- > > 0.7.20200729gitaf2e013.fc34.noarch > > gtk+-1:1.2.10-96.fc34.i686 > > gtk+-1:1.2.10-96.fc34.x86_64 > > gtk+-devel-1:1.2.10-96.fc34.i686 > > gtk+-devel-1:1.2.10-96.fc34.x86_64 > > gxvattr-0:1.3-42.fc34.x86_64 > > librcc-devel-0:0.2.12-18.fc34.i686 > > librcc-devel-0:0.2.12-18.fc34.x86_64 > > librcc-gtk+-0:0.2.12-18.fc34.i686 > > librcc-gtk+-0:0.2.12-18.fc34.x86_64 > > logjam-xmms-1:4.6.2-25.fc34.x86_64 > > manedit-0:1.2.1-25.fc34.x86_64 > > qepcad-B-0:1.74-1.fc34.x86_64 > > sagemath-0:9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 > > sagemath-core-0:9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 > > sagemath-data-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-combinatorial_designs-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-conway_polynomials-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-elliptic_curves-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-elliptic_curves_large-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-etc-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-graphs-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-data-polytopes_db-0:9.2-4.fc34.noarch > > sagemath-jupyter-0:9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 > > sagemath-sagetex-0:9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 > > surf-geometry-0:1.0.6-29.fc34.x86_64 > > xarchon-0:0.50-35.fc34.x86_64 > > xconvers-0:0.8.3-27.fc34.x86_64 > > xdialog-0:2.3.1-28.fc34.x86_64 > > xmms-1:1.2.11-41.20071117cvs.fc34.x86_64 > > xmms-devel-1:1.2.11-41.20071117cvs.fc34.i686 > > xmms-devel-1:1.2.11-41.20071117cvs.fc34.x86_64 > > xmms-flac-0:1.3.3-7.fc34.x86_64 > > xmms-libs-1:1.2.11-41.20071117cvs.fc34.i686 > > xmms-libs-1:1.2.11-41.20071117cvs.fc34.x86_64 > > xmms-pulse-0:0.9.4-27.fc34.x86_64 > > > > Michael > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
