Le mar. 29 juin 2021 à 18:06, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> a écrit : > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 17:56 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Le mar. 29 juin 2021 à 17:06, Andrew Bauer <k...@rpmfusion.org> a écrit > > : > > > > > > commit 10eafa1c47f7500a320ff2b1382f491a2cbd9f64 > > > Author: Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com> > > > Date: Tue Jun 29 10:04:53 2021 -0500 > > > > > > Update to latest fixes/31 > > > Don't require lame binary on el8 > > > > Thanks for forwarding the patches into branches. > > > > Btw I've asked if one could build a perl dependency missing for el8 > > and mythtv-backend. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977273 > > With that dependency, all mythtv packages should be installable in > > EL8... > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lame > > Release Stable version Version in testing > Fedora 35 lame-3.100-10.fc34 > Fedora 34 lame-3.100-10.fc34 > Fedora 33 lame-3.100-9.fc33 > Fedora EPEL 8 > Fedora EPEL 7 lame-3.100-1.el7 > Fedora ELN lame-3.100-10.eln109 > > > Only epel 8 is missing but we could ask for it . No we can't (at least not easily). As the lame package is in RHEL but only the libs- and (devel) are distributed. So we can't have it in EPEL easily.
Also having a lame binary is totally spurious. As I've written in the commit message, mythtv only uses the lame "libraries" and not the binary. We could still enforce the binary in fedora for more certainty, specially with plugins expectation. But there is no need to enforce when it's not needed. Thanks _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
