Le jeu. 23 févr. 2023 à 04:06, Gary Buhrmaster via
rpmfusion-developers <rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> a
écrit :
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:04 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> <domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> >
> > Is the original reason for this package being in RPM Fusion instead of
> > Fedora even valid? https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34#c0
> > said:
> >
> > This package cannot be allowed in Fedora since it retrieve information
> > from websites and thus could possibly violate EULA.
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure what the above means

I remember the problem to be more about the "Terms of Use" concept
that is a different kind of requirement than copyright or license
agreement.
Now with the current fedora legal landscape it's indeed worth to
revisit.  If allowed, moving packages from rpmfusion to fedora is
really a no brainer.

Now everyone can volunteer to do the legal clearing task...
_______________________________________________
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
  • xmltv in Fedora? (... Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via rpmfusion-developers
    • Re: xmltv in ... Gary Buhrmaster via rpmfusion-developers
      • Re: xmltv... Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers

Reply via email to