The current (rpy2-2.0.1) r_repr() method used indeed to be __repr__(). There are places in the documentation that were not updated, as you point it out.
This was changed to avoid flooding accidentally the console during interactive sessions. It is sometimes hard to anticipate what R functions return, and when working with large objects that's was a problem. L. Alan G Isaac wrote: > On 1/7/2009 5:13 PM Alan G Isaac apparently wrote: >> Access to robjects >> does not match the documentation > > Badly put: I should have said that > *representation* of robjects does > not match the documentation. > (And is therefore much less useful.) > > Alan Isaac > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It is the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB > _______________________________________________ > rpy-list mailing list > rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ rpy-list mailing list rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
