monipol wrote: > On 05/07/2009, at 04:03, Laurent Gautier wrote: >> monipol wrote: >>> On 04/07/2009, at 18:18, Laurent Gautier wrote: >>>> I finally patched and built win32 binaries for Python2.6/rpy2.0.6. >>>> >>>> 2.0.6 does not have user-visible changes compared to 2.0.5, but >>>> since the code was patched to let the win32 build and run the version >>>> number was bumped. >>>> >>>> The win32 binary and source can be found on sourceforge, the source is >>>> otherwise on Pypi. >>> Hello, Laurent. Does this mean you won't be releasing RPy2 on >>> SourceForge.net any longer? >> >> It doesn't. >> Pypi is convenient for people using easy_install, so I will try >> releasing on both >> (I tried putting the win32 build on Pypi, but it ended with an error >> message claiming an invalid package format). > > Ok, I've noticed that. I was temporarily confused because 2.0.6 is in a > .zip package instead of .tar.gz, but I've already tested it and > submitted it to Fink.
No hidden meaning. "python setup.py sdist" on a windows machine makes a .zip rather than a .tar.gz. Submitting after that the source to Pypi from a UNIX machine was a one liner, but I did not bother going through the Sourceforge interface for uploading. >>> I've just built 2.0.6 on Mac OS X via Fink and it worked fine. >> >> Good to hear that it is finally working. > > > Cheers, > > -- > monipol > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rpy-list mailing list rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
