On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:19:01AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > I've been in a similar situation myself, doing 20-30 sec updates on 50k+ > RRD files.
[...] > The big daddy of performance suck is then going to be, opening, closing, > and seeking the right spot in the files every time. Have you considered saving up updates and do them (say) 10 at a time? Sure, this is going to be a problem for that one user that happens to want to see the data of the past few minutes. But it would save you much disk access, wouldn't it? -- Alex van den Bogaerdt http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
