Binutils/gcc versions: binutils.ppc 2.17.50.0.3-6 gcc.ppc 4.1.1-30
Attached is the rrd, and here's 'bt f', but did I not compile everything
with -g properly? This same rrd and all the others work fine with the
rrdtool 1.2.23 binaries.
(gdb) bt f
#0 0x0ff6d1cc in rrd_close (rrd_file=0x0) at rrd_open.c:418
ret = 0
_page_size = 0
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernhard Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:49 AM
> To: Matthew Chambers
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rrd-developers] Seg fault with r1094
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:05:02AM -0500, Matthew Chambers wrote:
>
> >arch-specific folder. When you say send you a sample, do you mean the
> RRD
> >file that's crashing?
>
> Yes, the bzip2'ed rrd, and please also send me a "bt f" from gdb from
> where it is crashing. Somewhere rrd_close is called with a null
> rrd_file, but i don't see where this would be (look at rrd_info.c from
> trunk and search for rrd_file and rrd_close to see what i mean).
swap_free.rrd.bz2
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
