Hey Tobi, My apologies, I'm way behind on my inbox... Belated replies inlined below...
Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Jarod, > > I have applied your patch to rrdtool/trunk/contrib/php4 but I think > we should resolve the php4 sytuation by moving stuff into rrdtool > propper (aka the bindings directory) Looks like an 'svn add' was missed for rrdtool_logo.h before committing though. :) > I am not realy into php, so if you want to take a swing at it, this > would be great ... the idea as always is that the default is to put > the module into the rrdtool install tree with the option of having > it thrown into the php module pool (or whatever it is called) ... Okay, I'll see what I can do on this front when I have some time, but I'm all tied up with other stuff for at least another week or two. > Yesterday Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> As mentioned earlier, I've got a patch I've been throwing on top of the >> svn php code for the Fedora rrdtool RPMS. Of course, I can't rightly >> recall exactly what went wrong without the patch now (I'll give that a >> look soonish). But there's the php code in svn and the php code in the >> contrib directory: >> >> http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub/contrib/php_rrdtool.tgz >> >> There are some significant differences between the two, and when I first >> put together the patch I'm using, the tarball linked above was more >> up-to-date, so far as I could tell -- some of the php changes from >> Bernhard recently checked in were already in that tarball. So should the >> remaining differences be pulled in as well, and/or the tarball above be >> removed? >> >> Patch attached for reference, rebased against the latest svn trunk... >> >> > -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
