Hi Sebastian, I am having second thoughts ... with all the lowlevel functions exported, we are runnning into a maintenance nightmare as fahr as backward compatibility is concerned. A futere rrdtool version (1.4) which comes with a new fileformat, would have to emulate all these lowlevel interfaces ...
So how about this. We export the symbols but do NOT put them in rrd.h. this means that if someone wants to code, using them, it will work, but it will also mean that they have to use our private headers for compilation, makeing it clear that there is not guarantee for support in future versions ... cheers tobi Today Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > thanks ... included > tobi > > Today Sebastian Harl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 03:44:15PM +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > > hmm the patches seem to be missing > > > > Oops, sorry - attached now ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Sebastian > > > > > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 213 9902 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
