Kevin Thursday kevin brintnall wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:53:07PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > * thinking about the work dan is doing I think it would be an > > overall good thing to find a sensible design for rrd_open which > > de-coules internal and on-disk representation of rrd data to a > > large extent. > > Tobi, > > I think the various storage changes will involve quite a few iterations. > Do you think it makes sense to release 1.4 without backend changes, so > users can start to take advantage of rrdcached? > > I think there are many large installations that may benefit from > rrdcached.. However, probably most users won't want to track /trunk once > the storage back-end is in flux. > > Maybe we can start to tidy up for 1.4 now (while the storage code is > relatively stable) and target the storage changes (portable format, > different backends) for 1.5? yes you are right, this might be sensible ... release often, release early ... what work do you see for the cached ? cheers tobi > What do you think? > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
