Hi Florian, Saturday Florian Forster wrote:
> From: Florian Forster <[email protected]> > > - > - if ((rrd_fetch_fn(im->gdes[i].rrd, > - im->gdes[i].cf, > - &im->gdes[i].start, > - &im->gdes[i].end, > - &ft_step, > - &im->gdes[i].ds_cnt, > - &im->gdes[i].ds_namv, > - &im->gdes[i].data)) == -1) { > - return -1; > + int status; > + > + status = rrdc_fetch (im->gdes[i].rrd, > + im->gdes[i].cf, > + &im->gdes[i].start, > + &im->gdes[i].end, > + &ft_step, > + &im->gdes[i].ds_cnt, > + &im->gdes[i].ds_namv, > + &im->gdes[i].data); > + if (status != 0) > + return (status); > } > + else > + { > + int status; > + > + status = rrd_fetch_fn (im->gdes[i].rrd, > + im->gdes[i].cf, > + &im->gdes[i].start, > + &im->gdes[i].end, > + &ft_step, > + &im->gdes[i].ds_cnt, > + &im->gdes[i].ds_namv, > + &im->gdes[i].data); > + if (status != 0) > + return (status); > + } what is the idea behinde implementing remote access in graph explicity instead of just telling fetch about it and having it handle this transparently ? cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch [email protected] ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 _______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
