I favor: 2-clause BSD MIT
I'd be interested to hear Tobi's view on the subject. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Florian Forster <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Kevin and Sebastian, > > I would like to open up the rrdcached client interface so it can be used > from non-GPL applications. For that I would like to re-license the two > files > > src/rrd_client.h and > src/rrd_client.c > > to a more permissible license. I was thinking about using the MIT > license or the LGPL "2.1 or later". > > As far as I see, you two are the only other copyright holders on those > files [0]. Would a license change be okay for you? If so, which license > do you prefer? > > Regards, > —octo > > [0] It is kind of hard to tell because SVN doesn't differentiate between > author and committer. The mail goes to the mailing list as well, so > if I missed a contribution please speak up! The files list me as the > sole copyright holder which I believe is outdated. > -- > Florian octo Forster > Hacker in training > GnuPG: 0x91523C3D > http://verplant.org/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFLu4SeHdggu3Q05IYRAgkSAJ9e4PkMIxBpoAVs56r2T/Qmpd6+cwCgmK3H > gEWvpZ9RBIsE7cVL1WZGMvQ= > =sZ5r > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- kevin brintnall =~ /[email protected]/
_______________________________________________ rrd-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-developers
