Gellatly, Laurie wrote: > > > Hi, > I'd like to store three values, being the maximum, average and minimum > response times measured. This I'm doing now. I'd then like RRAs that > use consolidation of Maximum, Average and Minimum to correspond to the > DS so that my consolidation is logically: > the maximum of the maximums > the average of the averages and > the minimum of the minimums.
This is indeed the right way of doing it. > Extending the definition of the RRA to read: > RRA: CF[CF2,CF3..CFn]:xff:steps:rows > so you can define your consolidation factor for all or for each DS > would be great. I know that storage is cheap but when you start to > multiply up the number of RRDs that would be involved and then there > is the processing of the data. I don't get this part. In stead of storing minvals:1st,2nd,3rd.....Nth, avgvals:1st,2nd,3rd.....Nth, maxvals:1st,2nd,3rd.....Nth, you propose to store (at least: that's what I make from it) vals:1st min, 1st avg, 1st max, 2nd min, 2nd avg, 2nd .... This would only change the order of the numbers, not the amount. So, either you're overlooking something or I am. cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
