Gellatly, Laurie wrote: > Min Avg Max > Min Y N N > Avg N Y N > Max N N Y
Nope. You have *1* DS which, by nature, is the maximum, minimum and average value at the same time. Then you create three RRAs (each CF one time) and when consolidation occurs the RRAs will be filled in. If you have three DSes (A B and C) and only want minimum values for A, averages for B and maximum values for C you could of course have three separate RRDs. If you create just one RRD with the three RRAs in it, then yes: there will be considerable overhead. However, the "workaround" (as above) is simple and changing the RRD format seems (IMHO) not worth it. cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
