On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:46:13 +0700 (ICT) Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and that aggregate is what isn't supposed to exceed 1.54Mbps > > It is not "that" agregate, but "you" agregate, it is performing the > exact function of what the STACK command is supposed to perform. > > STACK does not place data one in front of the other, but one on top > (agregated, added to) of the other. > > You better graph the outOctet (as it seems to be higher) first with > AREA, then graph the InOctet with AREA, not with stack. > > Olivier hi. look, I'm stacking it on purpose, so that I can get a quick glimpse of total/aggregate bandwidth. I think that's pretty obvious. If you look at all the fancy borders and CDEFs I use in the graph, I think it's clear I know the basics of RRDtool and am not screwing up using a simple drawing command. so, again: I'm stacking them on purpose, I know the graphs are accurate because other programs back it up (see my original post). that's not my question my question is: how am I exceeding the bandwidth limitation for a T1? any ideas accepted. -mateusz- -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
