Hi again, as I understood the answer of Tobi, he is not quite willing to have such an additional consolidation function added. Probably because keeping the update function small and efficient is a main point. OK, fair enough.
But then a perfect solution would be to have the possibility to use a variable in CDEF's that represents the number of consolidated points in an RRA, BUT DIFFERENT FOR EVERY RRA IN THE RRD, because the whole problem arises since an 'rrdtool graph .... CDEF..' command applies to all the RRA in the RRD. You could then call 'rrdtool graph' with one CDEF that says 'multiply data_source (which is AVERAGE CF'ed in the RRA's ) by steps_rra (which is the steps value of the RRA's RESPECTIVELY). Wouldn't this be great! Tobi, would it be a problem to have something like this being implemented? I cannot determine how complex this would be. Thanks and greetings from sunny Stuttgart Matthias -- =================================================================== == from: Matthias Mikuletz == == ILpÖ -- Universität Stuttgart == == jobfon 0711/121-4142 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] == =================================================================== -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
