Got'chya, ok.
So the original behavior was recursive, but you patched it so it is not
recursive? If that's the case, could you possibly send me the patch so I
can reverse-engineer and get the recursive functionality back?
Thanks
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Thomas Erskine wrote:
>
> Hi Paul.
>
> At 14:28 2002-08-09 -0700, Paul Wickman wrote:
> >Using rrdcgi to easily generate some graphs. So far, so good.
> >
> >One problem. I use the <RRD::INCLUDE> tag to include the contents of
> >another file. In the included file, I tried using other <RRD::> tags, but
> >they don't seem to get expanded. Is this a bug or in this intentional?
>
> I'll answer, since I suggested and wrote the original patch: it's
> intentional. The patch was written (very selfishly :-), because I needed
> the functionality of sucking in arbitrary files containing small pieces of
> data for remstats, so that pages didn't need to be re-written on every
> collection. I didn't need it to behave recursively, so I didn't write it.
>
> >--
> >Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
> >WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
>
> --
> Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
> WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
>
>
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
