[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have table set up with a stepping of 1 minute (overkill, I know) and I'm
Not necessarily overkill. If you have (besides your AVERAGE RRA) a MIN and/or a MAX RRA, you will get numbers that are more "real" than the default of 5-minute step sizes. > able to graph everything fine and honky dorey, but the same management that > wants that same granularity is also confused by the relatively low numbers, > despite the fact that they're per minute. Are they? If your DST is either COUNTER, ABSOLUTE or DERIVE, you're storing *per-second* data. If doesn't matter in that case what your step size is. > So, I'm wondering if it's at all possible to take the averages and actually > do a per hourly graph? I've done everything I can think of with playing with > the CDEF, but limiting the graph to those new steps is difficult at best. You mean: they want to see "between 8am and 9am: foo", "between 9am and 10am: bar" sort of statistics? To actually get the per-hour numbers just multiply by 3600 in a CDEF and use the result to GPRINT. To *see* those blocks in the image, try "--step 3600" and display the resulting CDEF with LINEx or AREA. HTH -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
