GPRINT shouldn't have any affect on the graphing exponents, so this one is a loss for me. I've used the --unit-exponent switch before with no problems on Windows NT/2000/XP and Linux. Mind you I've been using it with the RRDTool Perl module and not right from the command line, but that shouldn't make a difference.
Jason... -----Original Message----- From: Mat Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:21 PM To: Warnes, Jason SktnHR Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [rrd-users] (forw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: weird figures] i did have --units-eponent=1 but i changed it to 0 and it has made no difference. I don't know if this has anything to do with it but my GPRINT statements use sprintf-style formatting like: GPRINT:b:LAST:"Current\: %8.2lf %s" On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:06:45 -0600, Warnes, Jason SktnHR wrote: > The 'm' in 140m is milli meaning 1/1000th of a full unit. So 140m > would be the same as 0.0140, which isn't very close to the 0.04 that > you're expecting. If you don't want RRDTool auto scale the units, > you'll need to add > > --units-expontent=0 > > to your command line. Try that out and see if it's more to what > you're expecting. > > Jason... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 7, 2003 8:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [rrd-users] (forw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: weird figures] > > > I am forwarding this as I think the DNS for ethz.ch was down earlier > today and me message didn't get through. > > > ----- Forwarded message from Mat Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ----- > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:51:10 +0000 > From: Mat Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: weird figures > User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i > X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18-18.7.xsmp (i686) > X-Uptime: 11:49am up 10 days, 23:50, 4 users, load average: 0.03, > 0.05, 0.05 > X-GPG-Key: 0xC37D57D9 > X-Wise-Words: ... I see TOILET SEATS ... > > I have a collection of rrd's and graphs sources from various perl and > shell scripts that I wrote. > > All the graphs work beatifully except for the load average. The graph > itself is ok, but the GRPINT figures are way out. For example, the > 1min load average may be 0.04 but the GPRINT will read 140m (million?) > The readings vary which makes me reluctant to think it is a scaling > problem. > > any ideas? > > cheers people > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > Mat Harris OpenGPG Public Key ID: C37D57D9 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.genestate.com > > -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- > -- Err : No filename to use for decode, file stripped. > -- Type: application/pgp-signature > > > -- > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users > WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi -- Mat Harris OpenGPG Public Key ID: C37D57D9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.genestate.com -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
