Thanks for the info. I've created some new RRD databases with this configuration. I do see one negative however. The RRD files now take 3.3mb instead of 97k. Not too bad though. Does anybody know if there is a way to change the RRA configuration in existing databases? I looked at the tune command but I don't think this will do it.
Max > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephan Harren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 12:57 AM > To: Max Kipness; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] RRD History > > > I do: 'RRA:LAST:0.5:1:105120' and it works fine. No > negatives, no problems > with performance or anything. The big advantage with this is, > if you generate > your graphs on the fly, maybe from a website, you can zoom > into any timeframe > you want to see throughout the last year. > > Best regards, > > Stephan -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- Size: 2k (2532 bytes) -- URL : http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/p/3EB3CC7F307-winmail.dat -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
