Personally, I don't see why you'd specify a maximum. You can put a minimum of 0, that's fine unless your interfaces plan on reversing somehow ;)
Why bother when you don't have to? Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 00:14 Subject: [rrd-users] reasonable maximums > Hi, I was unsure of how my graphs would be built initially, as I'm > monitoring ipfw rules with a theoretical limit of 100 megs (although in > theory the loopback can go faster, we'll assume it won't). > > It probably doesn't matter, but my counters return bytes, but the standard > seems to be bits, so I'm multiplying the data * 8. > > With this in mind, what should I set my maximum as? Is it as simple as > 100 * 1024 * 1024 (104857600) or am I missing something that'll bite me > in the behind later? > > Thanks, and happy new year. > > -Dan Mahoney > > -- > > "You're a daddy. I'm a mommy. She's our baby. Deal with it." > > -Cali, 11/7/02, about 1:35 AM > > --------Dan Mahoney-------- > Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek > Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC > ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM > Site: http://www.gushi.org > --------------------------- > > > -- > Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users > WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi > > -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
