Michael Reynolds wrote: > Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > > >>If I understand what you're trying to ask, you're looking for: >> >>In: Current: 120.53MB/s Average: 20.12MB/s Max: 125.00MB/s >>Out: Current: 1.00 B/s Average: 3.00 B/s Max: 10.00MB/s >> >>and so on. In other words, you need alignment of the text. >> >>So, why aren't you using the formatter string to specify a fixed >>length for the numbers? > > Mostly because it would be confusing for people to read. Second, > because measurements aren't always done in bytes, and sometimes require > no abbreviation, so I can't specify a length of %3.2lf%sB/s and get away > with it.
Silly me, I read your message wrong, I think. The alignment of the numbers does not matter, it's the alignment of the labels (in/out/current/average/max/etc) that matters. If I use left alignment, all of the groups (in/out/icmp/etc) should left align. Additionally, the Current labels should be left aligned, likewise with Average and Max. That is, if \t existed, and I used it. Here's an (ugly) example: COMMENT:In:\t COMMENT:Current: GPRINT:in:LAST:%.2lfB/s\t COMMENT:Average: GPRINT:in:AVERAGE:%.2lfB/s\t COMMENT:Max: GPRINT:in:MAX:%.2lfB/s\l >>Alex -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
