I see Alex, maybe you are right, but, forget about the maximums then, why the graph line value -forget the legend- is that one?, this is not the MAX but the AVERAGE, isn't it? And, how can these two attached images be explained?, both are identically generated but -h and -w option, why if there is two graphs :((
and thank you again for your help Alex fernando > -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Alex > van den Bogaerdt > Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de abril de 2004 11:28 > Para: [email protected] > Asunto: [rrd-users] Re: wrong values when graphing with RRD > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Fernando Nieto wrote: > > Hello Alex, thank you for your answer, but I'm not completely agree > > with you, let me explain. > > > > I have something like the following: > > > > DS:ds0:GAUGE:600:0:U > > DS:ds1:GAUGE:600:0:U > > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:2328 > > > > Every record stores 8 days of samples collected every 300 > seconds. The > > RRA step is 1, so every PDP is AVERAGEed to form one CPD, that is, > > every value becomes one CPD. > > CDPs are NOT visible on the graph (nor in the legend). > Consolidation happens not only when data is stored, it also > happens when data is graphed. > > I repeat: > > > > MAX( AVERAGE(5,5) , AVERAGE(0,0) ) > > > > > > is different from > > > > > > MAX( AVERAGE(5,5,0,0) ) > > You are telling RRDtool to do something and RRDtool is doing > exactly what you ask it to do. If you want the maximums, do > not ask for the averages. > > Alex > -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below -- -- Type: image/gif -- Size: 6k (6490 bytes) -- URL : http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/p/04-graph_small.gif -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below -- -- Type: image/gif -- Size: 7k (8066 bytes) -- URL : http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/p/04-graph_big.gif -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
