Stephan Harren wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I think, it might be good for you to read the tutorials and manuals > about rrdtool. But anyways, what do you want to achieve? Showing > everything allright when there are NaN's? It is not very nice to say: > "Okay, if I don't know what happened, probably everything was allright.".
Well, not really. I'm still graphing ups and downs (1's and 0's respectively) but I only want the service level line to report the average of everything EXCEPT unknowns. I don't want the SLA to be wrong because the polling PC missed a poll. Therefor I only want actual data to be graphed and unknowns ignored. > > But ok, there is one line that defines Cleaned: > > CDEF:Cleaned=Response,UN,0.0,Response,IF > > > This line sets all NaN to 0.0, insert whatever you want instead of the 0.0. > Good suggestion but its result is not quite what I was looking for. This makes all unknowns = 0.0 (or in my case I tried 1.0 - which made the graphs look far more successful than they should be) Again, the only acceptable result would be to eliminate unknowns entirely. > Cheers, > > Stephan > I'll go run through the tutorial pages again. It has been a while and though I felt comfortable with RRDTool afterward, this seemingly more complicated graph building syntax has be a little bewildered. Thanks, Eric Brander All questions to life's problems are easy, if you know the answer. -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
