Stephan Harren wrote:
> > Unknowns ARE ignored when calculating, so try not to use the "use 0 > instead of NaN"-Statements: > > But I guess, this will probably also have some disadvantages, because > calculating with NaNs can lead to strange effects. Giv it a try, but I'd > also prefer to use the "cleaned" version. > > Stephan > Stephan, This, I think, has produced ideal results IMHO. Thank you very much for your explanation and for writing it out for me. That helped a lot in having it make sense! Regards, Eric Brander -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
