On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:13:29AM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:57:13AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > Two weeks in the past, minus 300 seconds (why ?!?), means 14*86400-300 > > > seconds. > > > Each pixel column should display 300 seconds, so your graph needs to be > > > (14*86400-300)/300 pixels wide. Good luck. > > > > That was a hypothetical example. Let's say I want 3 days "width" at the 5 > > minute resolution. The same question still applies. Do I have to resort to > > "walking" along the graph in daily increments so as not to get > > consolidation? > > How can you display more than one interval in one pixel-column without > doing some kind of consolidation ?!? > > Indeed, you can't. > > So, if you want to see a 5 minute resolution, you cannot display more > than 5 minutes times the amount of pixels on the X-axis.
Of course you can't, which is why I'd be wanting a graph that is twice as wide. regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten! -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
