On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:50:35PM +0200, Stefan Berder wrote: [please don't cc me. I do read the list. Thanks]
> In fact my $epochstart is 5 seconds before the start of the real datas > and $epochend is 5 seconds after just to have some extra space. Ack. This works. Your log: ----cut here---- Creating the RRD charts epochstart: 1117524058 epochend: 1117524373 diff: 315 1117524058.DEBUG 1117524063:16.2551020408163:7:7:11:0:0:11:0 DEBUG 1117524064:16.2551020408163:2.8:2.8:5:0:0:5:0 DEBUG 1117524065:16.2551020408163:6.4:8.3:10:77557:2:8:0 [snip] DEBUG 1117524149:21.6902927580894:18.6875:31:16:405828:16:0:0 DEBUG 1117524150:21.6902927580894:15.0833333333333:24.1666666666667:12:272227:12:0:0 DEBUG 1117524151:21.6902927580894:15.5:38:2:144990:2:0:0 .DEBUG 1117524151:30.5067750677507:3.64:3.64:25:0:0:25:0 ----cut here---- Explain, to yourself not to me, those anomalies: "1117524058.DEBUG 1117524063:"..... Why this strange formatted line, where does "1117524058." come from. Is your first intended update indeed at time 1117524063 ? I guess so, as it's five seconds. In that case the log could use a carriage return/newline pair. "DEBUG 1117524151:21.6902927580894:15.5:38:2:144990:2:0:0 .DEBUG 1117524151:30.50"..... Why a dot, why that second timestamp 1117524151 Of course you get an error if you update twice at the same time. This is expected behaviour. Did you notice this? HTH Alex -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
