On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:10:24PM +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > More data: I have tried 1.0.49 and graphs were still ugly. 1.0.45 produce > nice and correct graphs. > > Here is a piece of my Makefile: > > [ here are all DEFs and CDEFs ] > AREA:149_156_in_Mbps#cc8000:'Edu (149.156.0.0/16) ' \ > STACK:195_150_in_Mbps#208820:'Com (195.150.0.0/16) ' \ > STACK:193_193_64_in_Mbps#40cc40:'Com (193.193.64.0/19) ' \ > STACK:onet_in_Mbps#1010aa:'Onet (213.180.128.0/19) ' \ > STACK:interia_in_Mbps#eeee10:'Interia (217.74.64.0/22) ' \ > STACK:autocom_in_Mbps#aa4040:'Autocom (213.134.160.0/20) ' \ > LINE1:total_in_Mbps#000000:'total ' \ > COMMENT:'\n' \ > AREA:149_156_out_Mbps#cc8000 \ > STACK:195_150_out_Mbps#208820 \ > STACK:193_193_64_out_Mbps#60ff60 \ > STACK:onet_out_Mbps#1010aa \ > STACK:interia_out_Mbps#eeee10 \ > STACK:autocom_out_Mbps#aa4040 \ > LINE1:total_out_Mbps#000000 > > Do I make a mistake? Is above configuration wrong?
I've read a post about vnames starting with a number being incorrectly parsed as numbers. Can you try this script with names prefixed by a character such as x and post your results? -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
