Yesterday Salvatore D. Tepedino wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 23:32 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > > Since N: ist the curren time, this seems to be bad for reproducing > > anything ... > > > > please try creating a demo script using absolute time including an > > absolute --start time when creating the rrd file ... > > I'm not sure what you're suggesting here. Normally, I create a rrd DB > without specifying a start time (doesn't it default to now?) then > updates after this would be inserted at the current time (N). Why should > that cause a unknown value to be stored as 0?
it does not cause it, but if I am going to look at the problem I need a reproducible example, and that must not have any things in it that change whenever one tries the example ... cheers tobi -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker @ ISG.EE, ETL F24.2, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich / // _ \/ _ \/ / System Manager, Time Lord, Coder, Designer, Coach /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker +41(0)44-632-5286 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
