Simon Hobson wrote:
> The first area statement should be WITHOUT the stack option, it is
> then drawn on the baseline, further areas are then define WITH the
> stack option so they are stacked on top of it. For the second group
> (the '-'s) you repeat the whole process. Eg :
>
> AREA:${IP}-in#${colour}:"${Address}"
> AREA:${IP}-in#${colour}:"${Address}":STACK
> AREA:${IP}-in#${colour}:"${Address}":STACK
>
> AREA:${IP}-out#${colour}:
> AREA:${IP}-out#${colour}::STACK
> AREA:${IP}-out#${colour}::STACK
Thanks guys, that works perfectly although I'm still totally
confused why my smaller version using the same code just
worked and this one didnt but hey ;)
Tobias the 95% was unknown data from 1 of the sources
which explains why I was seeing valid results when I
cut them down as I happened to be excluding the problem
source by coincidence.
All my problems with this now sorted again thanks for
your help most appreciated.
Steve
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the
person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the
recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise
disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
