Hi.. > > However, if I change the start timestamps to 1000000000 or greater, i.e. > No. If you change timestamps to be not n*300 you get this effect. Try > 1000000200, and try 999998900. > (n.b. it really is n*stepsize, not n*300)
that may be understandable, if he would only try to fill in data at timestamps not beeing n*stepsize into a given database which starts at n*stepsize ... but he accordingly changed the start timestamp of the db.. this means, rrdtool is unable to change the "start timestamp" and use this as base for the update- process? it seems to be impossible to use a different steptime than "n*stepsize+0" .. and this should be changed to "n*stepsize+starttime" ... Is it an error or a feature? Cu Rene. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ "Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht! -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
