On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 05:02:22PM -0400, Matt Pounsett wrote: > Thanks for the clarification.. I understand what's going on now, and > should be able to work around it. I think we'll wind up re-creating > these in order to get more of the data we want, later.
Don't forget to read that fine manual on "rrdtool resize" ! http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/doc/rrdresize.en.html Do not increase the amount of rows significantly in one go. Do this bit by bit, or else you will see NaN a lot when you query data that is available in other RRAs, but rrdtool selects the 5-minute RRA as a best match. Think about this for a while if you don't get it at first. HTH -- Alex van den Bogaerdt http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/ _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
